~Eigentum & Business Intelligence
Wer steckt wirklich hinter dem YouTube-Kanal fern?
- ~5,32 Mio. Abonnenten · ~594 Mio. Aufrufe
- 137 Videos · wöchentlich · Amsterdam
- Elektrisch: Electrify 50–80% · Capital D, MEP, Equable
- Startet: 11. Juli 2023
Verbindungs-Matrix
Die Knoten zeigen Eigentümer, Investoren, Marken, Firmen & Partner. Ziehe die Knoten per Drag & Drop, Hover zeigt Verbindungen, Klick wählt einen Knoten aus.
Kennzahlen & Diagramme
Eigentum, Wachstum, Einnahmen, Takt & Team — interaktiv
Abonnenten-Wachstum (Mio.)
Eigentumsstruktur
Einnahmen-Trend (2025–26, $k / Quartal)
Monatliche Einnahmen (Schätzung, $k)
Veröffentlichungs-Takt
Views nach Thema (Ø, Mio.)
Themen-Mix (letzte 10)
Team-Wachstum (geschätzt)
~100 Personen (nicht alle Vollzeit); ~30 Projekte gleichzeitig.
Geldfluss
Wohin das Geld fliesst
| Von | Zu | Betrag | Art |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital D / MEP / Equable | Electrify Video Partners | $135M–$185M raised | Funding |
| Electrify | Fern + Simplicissimus + UNFASSBAR (FernInvest B.V.) | 50–80% equity | Acquisition |
| Fern (© 594M views / 5.3M subs) | Operating company | AdSense + sponsors | Revenue |
| Operating company | David & Jonas | up to 49.9% share | Profit share |
| Operating company | Electrify | majority share of profits | Profit share |
| Electrify | Capital D / MEP / Equable | ROI on exit/IPO | Return |
Est. Electrify raised $135M (CBInsights) – $185M (Forbes/PitchBook): Capital D $85M (Sep 2023), MEP Capital $50M (Feb 2023), Equable Capital. Electrify holds 50–80% of the fern/Simpli/UNFASSBAR operating co.
Wer entscheidet
Kontrolle über fern
| Bereich | Wer | Ebene | Nachweis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative / editorial | David (ops), Jonas (creative), editors-in-chief (Paul Lühnsdorf, Cristian Kiesling, Chris Varga, Jonas Rump) | Hires Editors-in-Chief via Electrify recruitment | Control in question |
| Hiring / recruitment | Electrify (runs job postings under electrify.teamtailor.com) | Electrify | Confirmed: Electrify advertises & hires Fern roles |
| Business / operations | Electrify (publishing, title/thumbnail optimization, channel mgmt) | Electrify | Confirmed: Electrify hires Channel Managers & optimizes titles/thumbs |
| Fiscal / capital | Electrify → Capital D / MEP / Equable | Capital D | Confirmed |
| Back-office (HR, legal, admin) | Electrify | Electrify | Confirmed by founders ("Truth About fern") |
| Editorial independence | Claimed by David & Jonas (0 editorial influence) | David & Jonas | Disputed by community / GEN expose |
Befund: Wer kontrolliert fern?
Die Redaktion / Kreativ-Inhalte liegen bei David & Jonas. Aber Electrify stellt alle operativen Rollen ein (Channel Manager, Video Editoren, Partner-Marketing, Publishing), optimiert Titel/Thumbnails datengetrieben und übernimmt HR/Finance. Kapitalgeber (Capital D 30,31% an Electrify, MEP, Equable) sitzen oberhalb. Ökonomisch kontrolliert also Electrify (und indirekt seine Fonds); die Gründer signalisieren redaktionelle Unabhängigkeit.
Ist fern ein Gefäss für VC?
Themenauswahl, Finanzen & redaktionelle Freiheit
Kernfrage: Vermeidet fern bewusst Themen, die die finanzielle Interessen der Eigentümer/Investoren berühren? Evidenz dafür & dagegen:
Für die "Vessel"-These
- Electrify (PE) hält 50–80% — Mehrheitsinteresse an Profit/Exit.
- Electrify optimiert Titel/Thumbnails datengetrieben (Performance-Druck).
- Community (GEN-Expose, Reddit r/Laesternschwestern) wirft "brand safe"-Selbstzensur vor.
- Transparenzvideo zur Ownership wurde von Revolut (Finanzdienstleister) gesponsert — ein Finanzunternehmen finanziert das Video über Geld-Eigentümer.
- Revenu basiert auf AdSense+Sponastars, beide an Views gekoppelt → Anreiz, kontrovers-belastende Themen zu meiden.
Gegen die "Vessel"-These
- Gründer: "Redaktionell wird uns 0 reingeredet" (Community-Statement, Aug 2025).
- Video "The Truth About fern" zitiert ausdrücklich Berichte über Gaza trotz Sponsor-/Ad-Risiko.
- Start "Roots"-Newsletter, um Abhängigkeit von Algorithmus/Sponsoren zu reduzieren.
- Kritische Korruptions-/Konzern-Themen (Pharma $1,9 Mrd., Reichtum der Kirchen) wurden produziert.
- Gründer halten weiterhin bis zu 49,9% — wirtschaftlich mitbeteiligt, nicht nur Angestellte.
Bewertung
Kein harter Beleg für direkte Zensur einzelner Themen. Aber die Struktur (Mehrheits-PE, sponsor-abhängig, datengetriebene Optimierung) schafft einen strukturellen Anreiz, kontrovers-kommerzielle Risiken zu vermeiden. Eine explizite salden-nach Belägen der Eigentümer fand nicht statt; die Interessenkonflikte sind latent. fern ist nicht "nur ein Gefäss" — die Gründer sind real wirtschaftlich 49,9% beteiligt — aber die Finanzkontrolle liegt bei Electrify/Capital D.
Veröffentlichungs-Timeline (on-site)
Titel & Daten direkt vom YouTube-Kanal
| Date | Title | Theme |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-02 | The Death of Educational Content on YouTube | Meta-commentary on the platform & its economics |
| 2026-08-26 | The $1 Billion McDonald’s Box | Corporate / consumer scandal |
| 2026-08-19 | The Unsolved Murder in Room 1046 | True crime |
| 2026-08-12 | How China’s Biggest Scammer Got Caught | Scam / criminal |
| 2026-08-05 | Exposing a $1,900,000,000 Pharma Company | Corporate investigation |
| 2026-07-29 | Hansa: The Infiltration of the Dark Web | Cyber crime |
| 2026-07-22 | The Truth About fern ⬥ self-referential | Ownership / origin transparency (Revolut-sponsored, 5M milestone) |
| 2026-07-15 | Why Africa Hates McDonald’s | Corporate / culture |
| 2026-07-08 | Inside the Dark World of Poker Cheating | Investigation |
| 2026-06-30 | The Kid Who Hacked America | Cyber crime (Kevin Mitnick) |
Cadence ≈ weekly (1.2/wk). Weekly output predates and postdates the Electrify deal — no visible change in upload frequency.
Einnahmen-Schätzungen
Reine Schätzungen aus öffentlichen Daten (CPM variiert)
| Source | Metric | Monthly |
|---|---|---|
| SocialBlade | 5.3M subs · 594M views · 137 vids | ~$10K–$74K / month |
| vidIQ | 5.31M subs · +110K/mo | ~$55.7K / month (AdSense) · ~$13.9K / video |
| OutlierKit | 5.1M subs · 545M views | $35K–$112K / month incl. sponsorship ($27K–$37K ad-only) |
| youtubers.me | 4.8M subs | $6K–$80K / month |
| hafi.pro | multi-platform | $156K–$196K / month (all platforms) |
| Channel valuation (est.) | — | $352K–$1.79M (OutlierKit) to ~$3.5M (ytnetworth) |
Most reliable middle estimate: ~$40K–$60K/mo AdSense on fern alone, plus sponsorships (native in-video slots), plus Simplicissimus (2.5M) + UNFASSBAR podcast + cross-platform. Aggregate multi-channel revenue likely > $1M/yr. All figures are estimates.
Gegencheck: "The Truth About fern" (Video-Skript)
Aussagen des Videos vs. unabhängige Befunde
| Aussage | Verdict | Kommentar |
|---|---|---|
| "David & Jonas met in high school in Germany" | CORROBORATED | My finding: German founders. Confirmed — both German, met in high school, friends since; uni in the Netherlands. |
| 2015 Simplicissimus, 2019 English precursor channel | REFINED | The video names the English precursor "Reezy" (not "Reasy"/"Reazey"). Hit 100K subs in 4–5 videos; Simone Giertz tweeted their Shell-greenwashing video; died back under 100K. |
| Funk (ARD/ZDF) → independence 2022 | CORROBORATED | Matches independent Media Ownership Monitor (MOM-GMR) + my finding. |
| Elmer (his channel "Hook") co-founded with David & Jonas, stepped back, stays voice-over | NEW ID | The transcript idents the Dutch co-founder (web source code-name "Hoog") as "Elmer", original channel "Hook". Quit ~4 months / ~15 videos in; no drama, friends. |
| Fern launched July 11, 2023 | CORROBORATED | Explicit launch date in transcript; matches channel brand/format. |
| Team ~60 → ~100 people · ~30 projects live · 2–4 mo post · 500–1000+ hrs/video | CORROBORATED | Explicit in transcript; ~100 across channels + podcast (+ ~60 at time of Electrify approach). |
| Electrify partnership from January 1, 2025; took over HR/legal/admin; ex-Netflix/BBC talent | CORROBORATED | Explicit start date 2025-01-01 (announced publicly Jan 17, 2025). Electrify runs hiring/channel ops/publishing; brought Netflix/BBC production expertise. |
| Consulted Derek (Veritasium) before deciding on Electrify | NEW | Founders spoke to Derek Muller about his experience; work-life balance improved. |
| Income = AdSense + sponsors, both tied to views | CORROBORATED | Two revenue pillars, both view-dependent. Matches third-party estimates. |
| Third pillar "Roots" (free newsletter) to reduce algorithm/sponsor dependence | NEW | Newsletter every other week, no ads inside; funds controversial topics that won’t get clicks/sponsors. |
| Explicitly cites covering "Gaza" despite ad/sponsor risk | PARTIAL / CLAIM | "Tough to find brands willing to buy a slot in an investigation into journalism in Gaza. That will never mean we wouldn’t make a video like this." — claimed, no specific Gaza video cited. |
| Sponsored by Revolut (fintech) on the transparency video | COUNTERPOINT | The transparency video itself is financed by a financial-services brand — notable given the ownership/finance topic. |
| No explicit disclosure of who owns the operating company / share % | GAP | Says "partnered with Electrify" but never states the 50–80% majority stake, founders’ up-to-49.9%, or upstream investors (Capital D 30.31% of Electrify, MEP, Equable). Community still asks "who actually owns it?". |
Source: "The Truth About fern" (Jul 22, 2026, ~13 min, 5M-subscriber milestone, sponsored by Revolut), cross-referenced against this on-site audit. Full auto-transcript API was rate-limited; summary via public transcript providers.